AI-guided workbenches, simulations, games, and odd tools
Single-name model
Stock macro sensitivity review
Explain how a selected equity historically moved with rates, inflation, growth, credit stress, and commodity inputs using transparent model diagnostics.
Regression ready
Guided intake
Start with a decision, not a blank prompt
The workshop guide uses these intake points to ask sharper questions before producing structured output.
Goal
What decision should stock analysis support?
Inputs
Which dataset, ticker, scenario, or assumption set should be trusted?
Constraint
What risk limit, horizon, or caveat should shape the output?
Output contract
Every useful answer becomes a card stack
Recommendation
What the workflow suggests and why it is not automatic advice.
Evidence
The metrics, chart movement, or model signal supporting the view.
Caveat
The assumption, missing data, or model risk that could change the result.
Next step
The most useful follow-up action before exporting or sharing.
Rate beta
-0.42
Demo coefficient versus real 10-year yield changes
CPI sensitivity
-0.18
Lower is better for inflation shock resilience
Model fit
0.64 R2
Enough to inform questions, not enough to automate trades
Professional review checklist
OKUse split-adjusted prices and consistent return frequency.
OKFlag coefficients that change sign across rolling windows.
OKDocument excluded events such as mergers, splits, or crisis periods.
Empty state behavior
Enter a ticker and macro factor set to generate the first sensitivity table.
Correlation is not causation. Results are model-dependent and assume regime stability.